Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Ashes and Affirmation in the Light of True Humanity



As we come again to the beginning of the season of Lent—the Church’s primary season of repentance—I can’t help but think about how profoundly counter-cultural (and plain weird) it is to walk up to a priest, kneel, get some ashes rubbed on your forehead, and listen to them remind you that you are going to die; “Remember, O man, that dust thou art, and to dust thou shalt return.” C’mon, it’s weird! Repentance isn’t a sexy word; it doesn’t fit in with our emphasis on being “self-made” people or with the popular mantra of “no regrets.” Our culture seems largely concerned with the importance of having a positive self-image, and this usually means being always affirmed, but what if the way of repentance is the only way to for us to see ourselves honestly, without resorting to seeking out our worth at the expense of the other?

John Calvin, in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, writes, “As long as we do not look beyond the earth, being quite content with our own righteousness, wisdom, and virtue, we flatter ourselves most sweetly, and fancy ourselves all but demigods.”[1] Of course, he goes on to make a point that is foreign to a catholic mind—the theory of “total depravity”—as it fails to account for the goodness of creation. Nevertheless, his immediate point is sound: We can always find some other human that we find “repugnant” or “disgusting” enough to make us pretty confident in our assumed “goodness.” The great irony, of course, is that in this perspective our “positive self-image” is dependent on the judgment and demonization of another. If we, even sometimes for valid reasons, find our sense of righteousness and self-worth in light of our opposition and moral superiority to anyone—a president, someone who supported a different political party, a “bigot,” a murderer, an annoying co-worker, a sibling, a refugee, a celebrity, a rapist, a hypocrite, a Wall Street trader, Hitler, anyone—we miss the point and we hide ourselves from the true point of self-discovery. I am absolutely not implying that it is unnecessary to oppose destructive actions in society or to stand against injustice, but I am saying that we don’t find our true worth by comparing ourselves to those who we find objectionable. Instead—strangely—we find it in ashes.

In our mortality we are all equal. We cannot build a tower, or a palace, or a wall that will keep us safe from death. It is the great equalizer. For a Christian, there is a particular death that we look to to find truth. The ashes that we receive on our foreheads on Ash Wednesday are in the form of a cross. We are directed beyond our own mortality to a moment in history and to an obscure man who died as a criminal on a hill outside Jerusalem. In Jesus, the God-Man, we see that the true point of humanity is not self-assuredness, ratings, moral superiority, pride, success, honor, cozy affirmation, respect, or any other predictable human endeavor or desire. Instead, we see a perfect self-offering for the sake of the other. We see extreme humility. We see God naked on a cross. We are of course free, as Calvin implies, to find someone “lesser” who makes us feel superior—wiser, more loving, more beautiful, more “woke”—but in that we are perpetuating the same destructive game that we claim to be fighting against. Instead, we can repent in dust and ashes, acknowledging our mortality and insufficiency, and look to the one True Human. When we see him for who he is, then maybe we can begin to be honest with ourselves—seeing both the good and the bad. It is in the divine self-emptying of the cross that we find our worth. We are beloved at the expense of no one but God. We also will die, and there’s nothing that we can do about that. But death, as we come to find out, isn’t the last word. In the meantime, maybe we need someone to rub some ashes on our foreheads once a year, look us in the eyes, and say to us, “Remember, O man, that dust thou art, and to dust thou shalt return.”





[1] John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book I. p 38.

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Sex, Beauty, and the Holy Other

We live in a peculiar age. There is simultaneously a profound concern for others and a deep obsession with self. Our understanding of sex and personhood has been formed by this present paradox. The big conversation over ‘consent’ as a sexual ideal is understandable in our current climate where the President of the United States has brazenly bragged about violating women and shrugged it off as casual conversation, and where a Stanford University swimmer has drunkenly raped a female student and our justice system appears to be more concerned about his future than hers.
But despite the obvious importance of consent, the root of our problem is deeper than the lack thereof. In an age where our “heart” is the ultimate guide and our appetites are instantly gratified, how do we learn to love a person not just because of what they do for us, or even how they make us feel, but in the mysterious otherness of who they are?
Song of Songs and Beauty
There is a strange book in the Bible called the Song of Songs, where we don’t even find mention of God’s name. Instead, we find a collection of erotic love poems that vividly describe physical and sexual desire between lovers. There has been a temptation to “spiritualize” the Song in Christian history, as its overt sexuality was an embarrassment to some more prudish ages, but I would like to argue that it is precisely its unabashed physicality that can speak to our age—a physicality of awe and otherness with which we seem to have lost touch.
Set in a time that was even more deeply entrenched in abusive male dominance, the mutuality of love that we find described in the Song is particularly powerful. The famous phrase, “I am my beloved’s and my beloved is mine” (6:3), indicates a powerful sense of mutual self-surrender that is deeply counter-cultural in a patriarchal society. There is also an almost modern feel to the female lover’s line, “This is my beloved and this is my friend” (5:16). The “call and response” of the lovers found in chapters four, five, and seven are an example of a mutual pursuit of the other.
This pursuit is not out of lust or conquest, but the lovers’ response to a deep awe encountered in the profound otherness of the beloved. In his book Christianity and Eros, Philip Sherrard states,
In lust, it is the self that is the center of attraction, and the object which stimulates it is simply an object and nothing more. That is why lust dies when it is satisfied: it ends with self-gratification… In love, it is not the self but the object which is the center of attraction. One can go even further and say that the object of love ceases to be an object and becomes an ‘other,’ a particularized being, and it is this ‘other’ that is the center of attraction.[1]
Song of Songs enumerates this ‘otherness’ in the litanies of physical beauty and the poetic metaphors and similes used to describe them. The man praises his beloved’s eyes, lips, teeth, neck, breasts, feet, rounded thighs, belly, and nose using lofty, metaphoric imagery (largely lost on us moderns) like doves, a flock of goats, shorn ewes, and so on. Her whole body receives praise and admiration. Likewise, the woman finds similar (and different) attributes to praise: head, eyes, cheeks, lips, arms, body, legs, appearance, and speech; comparing them to gold, alabaster columns, trees, etc. In these strange litanies there is a wholistic seeing of the other.
 There is also a vivid and reoccurring theme of longing to “taste the fruits of the garden,” which while referring directly to lovemaking, also hints at a return to Eden, when man and woman were naked and unashamed. These profound acknowledgements of the ‘holy other,’ whose goodness exists independently, peel back objectifying lust to reveal a deeper well of wholistic sexuality.
Mutual Objectification
We live in an age confident in our “sexual enlightenment.” Yet many, sadly, continue to be treated as less than human. With the commodification of sex and the general view that pornography is normative and healthy, we substitute object for other. Pornography—which is hypothetically consensual, in its basest sense—and the objectifying culture that pervades our time—is the result of a reductionist ethic that turns consent from a basic moral obligation into an ideal, at the expense of authentic personhood. ‘Consensual objectification’ is a false substitute for a genuine reverence of the other as a child of God, holy and whole apart from our desires.
Creatures of the Borderlands
The idea that “everything is permissible as long as everyone is okay with it and no one gets physically hurt” is fine in a materialistic sense, but fails to account for the metaphysical reality in which we exist. Evelyn Underhill called humans “creatures of the borderlands.” The Gnostic tendencies in both the “spiritual but not religious” movement as well as certain Christian groups attempts to find our true worth as spirits opposed to bodies. In the face of this, sacramental Christianity proclaims boldly that you are a body and a soul. In abandoning the understanding that we are our bodies, humans generally fall into one of two categories: escapism, denying the goodness of creation; or libertinism, which has no guard against objectification. If we acknowledge our peculiar place in the universe as creatures of the borderlands—truly body and soul—we can begin to feel the weight of how we how we use our bodies and how we treat others’ bodies.
My son is three and in pre-school. His teachers have taught him, when someone hits him or touches him in a way that he doesn’t like, to say, “don’t touch my body like that.” While this can lead to some funny looks when he says it to me (unnecessarily) in line at the grocery store, I think they are onto something in encouraging self-identity with the body, not just the emotions. What we do with our bodies and minds affects us. The way we see others both forms us and informs how we treat others. (This is true not only in sexual terms, but also in how we interpret race, class, gender, etc.) The canonical worth of this strange book, in its canticles of wholistic beauty and rightly ordered sexuality, is evident. The Song of Songs presents both our bodies and those of others as more than objects for self-gratification or domination. It instead recognizes their unique goodness and capacity for mutual self-surrender, always in the context of the whole person that God loves.
[1] Sherrard, Christianity and Eros. 45,46.

This post originally appeared on http://theologicalmisc.net/

Sunday, November 27, 2016

With a little help from my friends


Dear friends,

The premise of this post may be a bit of a surprise to some of you, but probably not a total shock. I have recently begun coursework toward a Masters in Theological Studies and am exploring a call to ministry in the Episcopal Church. It’s a little weird to write that, but life is weird!

I’ve lived a peculiar life. I have been playing music as a full-time career since before I graduated high school. Music has taken me all over the world and has brought me into friendship with each of you. While touring from city to city I’ve tried to make it a point to get out of the dingy clubs that we play in night after night to see and appreciate the architecture, food and beer, and distinct beauty that each place has to offer. I remember biking from a club in Cologne, Germany over the Rhine River to see the awe-inspiring Cathedral, right as the sun was setting. I stumbled upon one of my now-favorite beers, Pliny the Elder, after a Divine Liturgy while recording in Northern California. Once, while in Chicago for Lollapalooza, a nun at evening prayer assumed I was homeless (long hair and beard didn’t help) and offered me food, even though I actually happened to be on my way to dinner at Graham Elliot’s (two Michelin-star) restaurant, by invitation of the chef! Not bragging—just good irony!
          
Have you noticed a theme? As I’ve travelled across the country and the world I’ve found myself drawn to beautiful churches, and more importantly to what was going on inside of them. More often than not these were Episcopal or Anglican churches. I was raised a Christian, but through these experiences I rediscovered my faith in the catholic tradition of the Episcopal Church. The recitation of the Church’s daily prayers has given me a sense of constancy amidst the inconsistency of travel; the Blessed Sacrament has been my sustenance amidst endless days of Taco Bell and truck stops. Thanks to the odd pace of tour-life, I've also had a lot of time to read. I’ve pored over the Church Fathers, theological titles, and even developed a silly interest in “ecclesiastical fiction.” Through the years I've had a growing sense that I need to explore why I'm so drawn to these things. 

I have begun theological education at Nashotah House Theological Seminary, an Episcopal school in Wisconsin, as a form of active discernment. I am currently working toward my degree in the hybrid/distance program. This brings me out to Nashotah for one-week intensives of lecture and worship every quarter. I do the rest of my studies from home (or while on tour). I am still working out whether God has called me to “professional” service in the Church. To be honest, that's a scary idea. One thing that gives me peace is this: clergy in the Anglican tradition are a part of the action, but not the focus. As a bass player I resonate with this. I am used to being part of the action, but not the focus! The heart of the Anglican ministerial role is pointing beyond one’s self, in love and service to one’s community, and most profoundly by giving people Jesus, in Word and Sacrament. I believe in a God who—strangely—wants to be in relationship with us, and to have us in right relationship to one another. 

Life is weird! But I am deeply grateful for the strange wonder of this life and for the chance to spend this time working out how to best serve God and the world. Thanks so much for your love and support!

You can support my education and training in the following ways:

·      Commit to remember us in your prayers: I can use the prayers! (I also accept good vibes, if that’s your thing!) I expect to be continually challenged and formed in my studies and ongoing discernment. On top of that, I am learning how to balance the new responsibilities of studies with a growing family. We are about to welcome a baby girl into the family on the 2nd of December!

·      Commit to following our progress by reading blog and mail updates: I'd love to stay in touch and I'm going to continue to post regularly on my blog. As you probably know, I'm always happy to grab a coffee or beer if you are around LA and you can ask me easy questions like, "how can a good God allow evil?"

·      Commit to supporting my seminary study financiallyIf you have the means to support me financially in my seminary education my family and I would greatly appreciate it! School is not cheap and we are self-funding. It will take roughly $15,000 a year to pay for my education and training. Your regular support in any amount over the next three years would be an incredible help, as would any one-time gift. Contributions can be made online or through the post and are tax deductible

With ongoing love and appreciation,

Jonathan, Amy, Henry, & Baby Girl
November 27, 2016
The First Sunday of Advent